I am not sure why that hasn't happened said in Setting up a Ipac2: I might like to try to unify Arcade with Daphne at some point. Sure, I need a spreadsheet to keep track of what ROMs I have in there (what sets each one comes from) but it seems like the best option for me. They also don't care, so the Arcade folder just cuts through all of that confusion. The users don't understand why I would choose one emulator over another for a particular game. People would appreciate what I built more if they did not have to hunt for their games. Before I started using it, I would show a friend the system, and they would be scrolling through the gamelist looking for their favorite, and I was like, "oh, that one is listed under the FBA emulator," or, "oh, that game is vector, so it is under AdvanceMAME," and they would ask, "what is a MAME?" That's when I knew that having multiple arcade choices in ES-especially multiple MAMEs to choose from-was really confusing the casual user.
The benefit, even with this limitation, is that all arcade games (except laserdisc) are united under a single menu in ES. Actually, they already shared the one in the all configs directory, but the emulator-specific config ends up coming from the arcade config folder and all libretro cores must share. The stand-alones like AdvanceMAME will use their own configs as always, but the libretro cores will share the same retroarch.cfg.
#Mame bios files 0.191 code#
I think one reason why it is setup together is because lr-mame2000 and mame4all-pi are both built on the same mame code base and require the same romset.Īrcade combines all arcade emulators (except Daphne which is not really interchangeable with the others). I believe lr-mame2000 is the better name for the libretro version of mame4all. Is lr-mame2000 lumped mame4all? When I go to the launch menu with ROMs placed in the mame4all folder I can choose between mame4all or lr-mame2000 but when using Arcade it lumps all lr-mame configs (i.e.
0 kommentar(er)
